A Significant Ruling in Employment Relations
- maryline627
- May 7
- 2 min read
Updated: May 13

AI generated image
Case Summary: Successful Representation in Employment Dispute
Date: 4 July 2025 Authority: Employment Relations Authority, Christchurch Representatives: Maryline Suchley (Advocate for the Applicant) Applicant: Dharamjeet Singh Respondents: Majestywoods Limited, Majesty Care NZ Limited, Navneet Dhiman, Ramanpreet Singh
Overview
Dharamjeet Singh, had a successful outcome in his case against Majestywoods Limited and Majesty Care NZ Limited. The Employment Relations Authority issued a determination that validated Mr. Singh's grievances regarding unjustified actions and his dismissal.
Key Findings
Unlawful Premium:
Mr. Singh alleged that he was coerced into paying $33,000 for his work visa. The Authority found insufficient evidence to support this claim.
Unjustifiable Actions:
Rest and Meal Breaks: The evidence did not substantiate Mr. Singh's claims of not receiving adequate breaks during his employment.
Bullying Allegations: The Authority determined that allegations of bullying by directors were not credible.
Written Warning: The Authority found that Majestywoods and Majesty Care acted unjustifiably in issuing a written warning to Mr. Singh, leading to a disadvantage in his employment.
Unjustified Dismissal:
Mr. Singh's dismissal was deemed unjustified as the employers failed to follow a fair process in addressing performance-related concerns.
Remedies Awarded
Compensation: $21,000 for humiliation and loss of dignity due to unjustified actions and dismissal.
Lost Remuneration: $11,076.96 for lost wages resulting from the dismissal.
Wage Arrears: $4,079 for unpaid work hours.
Conclusion
This determination underscores the importance of fair treatment in employment relationships and the need for employers to adhere to proper procedures when addressing employee performance and disciplinary issues. It is a significant win for Mr. Singh, affirming his rights and providing him with just compensation for the injustices he endured.
This outcome not only serves as a resolution for Mr. Singh but also highlights the critical responsibilities of employers in maintaining fair workplace practices.




Comments